专家探讨全球化视角下的商务区绿色发展模式******
中新网12月27日电 题:专家探讨全球化视角下的商务区绿色发展模式
中新财经记者 庞无忌
2022北京CBD国际商务季“聚焦绿色建筑,打造绿色低碳商务区”线上分论坛日前成功举办。此次论坛由北京CBD管委会主办,奥雅纳承办,聚焦全球化背景下的商务区绿色发展模式。
中国建筑节能协会副会长李德英、北京CBD管委会常务副主任牛海龙和奥雅纳东亚区主席郭家耀分别致开场词。
论坛邀请中国建筑科学研究院、清华大学、北京市城市规划设计研究院、安永会计师事务所、戴德梁行等国内外机构专家、学者与企业代表,分享绿建低碳实践经验。
论坛上,北京CBD管委会发起《绿色低碳行动倡议》,倡导全体楼宇、招商机构、企事业单位,积极参与绿色低碳建筑创建行动,主动开展绿色电力交易和碳交易,发展和完善绿色低碳企业配套服务,支持和配合节能降碳交流平台搭建,培养引进绿色低碳人才,以全新发展理念引领城市可持续发展。
针对北京CBD绿色建设与发展,北京市城市规划设计研究院城市更新规划所所长王崇烈提出CBD六大发展策略:优化用地功能混合布局,构建全时空的中央的活力区;依托轨道站点聚集资源,引导城市高密度高效率发展;完善道路微循环促慢行,绿色出行引导生产生活;多样公共空间激发活力,多维绿色空间提升碳汇;更新利用活化既有建筑,高效运营城市存量空间;推广绿色建筑有效节能,全生命周期低碳运营与维护。
清华大学节建筑节能研究中心副教授魏庆芃表示,CBD需要通过价值管理重塑商业新常态,将可持续发展标准纳入社区园区和基础设施投资和发展策略,让基础设施和设备设施的运行更加低碳、绿色、健康和宜居。
北京达实德润副总经理朱文敏建议,北京CBD在现有良好的基础上,需推动零碳建筑示范项目的发展和突破,加强零碳技术的应用和推广,将绿色低碳实践推广到区域内更多业态中。
谈及绿色金融对我国实现碳中和的助力作用,中国国际经济咨询有限公司发展战略研究院副院长祖大军表示,强有力的绿色金融对策可助力我国尽早实现双碳任务。目前我国绿色债券用于绿色建筑领域尚不足。随着国家对地产建筑领域的政策支持,绿色债券值得大家关注。
奥雅纳院士、地产科技园区及社会基础设施业务全球负责人Paul Sloman,城市土地学会华盛顿特区可持续性发展和经济绩效中心执行董事Billy Grayson就全球CBD实现净零碳排放发展策略分享时表示,城市CBD脱碳需要城市管理者、公共和企业机构的共同努力,持续提高能源效率,投资可再生能源,不断创新和优化减碳措施。
金丝雀码头集团分享了他们如何与上下游供应链、承包商及合作伙伴联动,探索出一系列的减碳方案。
圆桌对话环节中,来自戴德梁行、中国建筑科学研究院、奥雅纳、安永、北京五一视界及北京建机天润资产管理有限公司的嘉宾们主要就建筑规范的绿色可持续发展方向、城市低碳规划与管理、数字科技碳中和、绿色地产开发、楼宇绿色认证及更新改造等话题展开了探讨。
据了解,目前,北京CBD区域现有楼宇均按绿色建筑评价或LEED认证的高标准进行建设或运营,CBD中心区及金盏国际合作服务区LEED金级及以上绿色建筑认证累计32个项目超过458万平米,CBD中心区绿建认证楼宇总体量占全市近四分之一。伴随绿色低碳全球化发展,北京CBD将着力推动CBD建筑领域绿色低碳转型,为北京实现碳达峰贡献力量。(完)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() ![]() 百姓彩票地图 |